About Question enthuware.ocejws.v6.2.84 :
Moderators: Site Manager, fjwalraven
-
- Posts: 15
- Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2014 1:58 am
- Contact:
About Question enthuware.ocejws.v6.2.84 :
Last option is not complete
-
- Posts: 429
- Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2012 2:43 am
- Contact:
Re: About Question enthuware.ocejws.v6.2.84 :
Can you be more specific of what is missing?
-
- Posts: 21
- Joined: Thu May 05, 2016 2:50 am
- Contact:
Re: About Question enthuware.ocejws.v6.2.84 :
Regarding this option:
If you use simple data types and all your clients respect Basic Profile v1.1 do you need a trial and error test with different clients?
Test different clients during the development
If you use simple data types and all your clients respect Basic Profile v1.1 do you need a trial and error test with different clients?
Nothing is said about particular data types so it should be assumed that the types in use are compatible.Discuss and define the data types with all the clients in advance and test (from different clients) them thoughout the development phases.
-
- Posts: 429
- Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2012 2:43 am
- Contact:
Re: About Question enthuware.ocejws.v6.2.84 :
Testing is always good, but when you only use simple data types you would normally find not any issues. Note that compliance to BP v1.1 does not guarantee interoperability.If you use simple data types and all your clients respect Basic Profile v1.1 do you need a trial and error test with different clients?
True, BP v1.1 does not say much about datatypes, but they can still cause interoperability issues. The use of xs:integer can for instance cause problems (you should use xs:int instead).Nothing is said about particular data types so it should be assumed that the types in use are compatible.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests