About Question enthuware.jwpv6.2.1081 :

Moderator: admin

Post Reply
sebastien
Posts: 12
Joined: Tue Mar 26, 2013 2:38 pm
Contact:

About Question enthuware.jwpv6.2.1081 :

Post by sebastien »

Hi,

maybe I'm wrong but I'm quite sure "class" have to be a super class of "type"

so second option is wrong and third is ok.

and the explanation is also wrong

please tell me if I'm wrong

Sébastien

Online
admin
Site Admin
Posts: 10408
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2010 9:26 pm
Contact:

Re: About Question enthuware.jwpv6.2.1081 :

Post by admin »

No, the given explanation is correct. Type can be a superclass. You may want to try it out.

thank you,
Paul.

asdf123
Posts: 1
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 4:20 pm
Contact:

Re: About Question enthuware.jwpv6.2.1081 :

Post by asdf123 »

It does not specify for answer 3 that com.abc.SubclassOfMyBean is a subclass for com.abc.MyBean (like in answer 2).

So the correct aswers would be:
2. <jsp:useBean id="bean1" scope="session" class="com.abc.SubclassOfMyBean" type="com.abc.MyBean"/> is a valid usage of useBean action. (Given that SubclassOfMyBean is a subclass of MyBean.)

3. <jsp:useBean id="bean1" scope="session" class="com.abc.MyBean" type="com.abc.SubclassOfMyBean"/> is a valid usage of useBean action.

5. <jsp:useBean id="bean1" type="com.abc.MyBean" /> is a valid usage of useBean action.


If the "(Given that SubclassOfMyBean is a subclass of MyBean.)" would be inside the question or next to aswer 3 as well, correct ones would be 2 and 5.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests