About Question enthuware.ocpjp.v11.2.3642 :
Moderator: admin
-
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2021 9:24 am
- Contact:
About Question enthuware.ocpjp.v11.2.3642 :
I think the code should be `Integer comparisonCode = 1;` for option 3 to not change the meaning of the code.
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 10053
- Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2010 9:26 pm
- Contact:
Re: About Question enthuware.ocpjp.v11.2.3642 :
You are right. Fixed.
thank you for your feedback!
thank you for your feedback!
If you like our products and services, please help us by posting your review here.
-
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2016 2:51 pm
- Contact:
Re: About Question enthuware.ocpjp.v11.2.3642 :
Hello,
I think the code should make usage of comparisonCode instead of .filter(a->a == 0) ?
For example:
So in this way we can answer that we can replace a -> comparisonCode.equals(a) with method reference comparisonCode::equals
I think the code should make usage of comparisonCode instead of .filter(a->a == 0) ?
For example:
Code: Select all
long l = courses.stream().peek(Course::printPassPercent)
.map(c -> testCategory.compareToIgnoreCase(c.getCategory()))
.filter(a -> comparisonCode.equals(a))
.count();
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 10053
- Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2010 9:26 pm
- Contact:
Re: About Question enthuware.ocpjp.v11.2.3642 :
Yes, that would be better.
thank you for your feedback!
thank you for your feedback!
If you like our products and services, please help us by posting your review here.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 50 guests