Page 1 of 1

About Question enthuware.ocejws.v6.2.84 :

Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2015 8:54 am
by mujahed
Last option is not complete

Re: About Question enthuware.ocejws.v6.2.84 :

Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2015 9:06 am
by fjwalraven
Can you be more specific of what is missing?

Re: About Question enthuware.ocejws.v6.2.84 :

Posted: Sat Mar 23, 2019 5:09 pm
by dfigueira
Regarding this option:
Test different clients during the development

If you use simple data types and all your clients respect Basic Profile v1.1 do you need a trial and error test with different clients?
Discuss and define the data types with all the clients in advance and test (from different clients) them thoughout the development phases.
Nothing is said about particular data types so it should be assumed that the types in use are compatible.

Re: About Question enthuware.ocejws.v6.2.84 :

Posted: Sun Mar 24, 2019 9:47 am
by fjwalraven
If you use simple data types and all your clients respect Basic Profile v1.1 do you need a trial and error test with different clients?
Testing is always good, but when you only use simple data types you would normally find not any issues. Note that compliance to BP v1.1 does not guarantee interoperability.
Nothing is said about particular data types so it should be assumed that the types in use are compatible.
True, BP v1.1 does not say much about datatypes, but they can still cause interoperability issues. The use of xs:integer can for instance cause problems (you should use xs:int instead).